Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreBCAJ Brieficles are short-format, web-only articles on contemporary topics of professional importance that are open-for-all to read & share.
Explore BrieficlesExplore past issues of BCA Journal & indulge in a treasure trove of high-quality professional content across format of print, videos & learning events from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreMonthly mouth-piece of BCAS, the BCA Journal is a leading publication that has been in continuous circulation for more than 53 years. Over the years the BCAJ has become synonymous with high-quality & authentic content across fields of finance, accounting, tax & regulatory matters. The BCAJ has wide circulation across India & commands huge respect amongst the Chartered Accountants` community.
Learn MoreFor queries, collaborations, and insights to forge, Drop a line, share thoughts, inquiries galore, At BCAJ, your messages, we eagerly explore.
Learn MoreThe existentialist dilemma before Indian democracy is stark :
it cannot co-exist with financial honesty. It does not matter if you are
personally incorruptible; you have to be institutionally corrupt in order to
engage in the business of democracy. The moral code of elections is
uncomplicated : Don’t ask. Don’t tell. And for God’s sake don’t get caught.
— M. J. Akbar
in India Today, dated 10-1-2011
(Source : Business Standard, dated 15-2-2011)
53 SC : No govt. wants a strong judiciary
The Supreme Court said no government wants a strong judiciary
and added that meagre budgetary allocations by the Centre and states came in the
way of setting up of courts and infrastructure to speed up the justice delivery
system.
It said : “No government wants a strong judiciary . . .
Budgetary allocation to judiciary is less than 1% by the governments. This shows
their commitment towards judiciary.” The remark from a Bench of Justices G. S.
Singhvi and A. K. Ganguly came when it was told that only one witness has been
examined in the last four years in the Amar Singh phone-tapping case, which has
been marred by adjournments.
(Source : The Times of India, dated 12-2-2011)