Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreBCAJ Brieficles are short-format, web-only articles on contemporary topics of professional importance that are open-for-all to read & share.
Explore BrieficlesExplore past issues of BCA Journal & indulge in a treasure trove of high-quality professional content across format of print, videos & learning events from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreMonthly mouth-piece of BCAS, the BCA Journal is a leading publication that has been in continuous circulation for more than 53 years. Over the years the BCAJ has become synonymous with high-quality & authentic content across fields of finance, accounting, tax & regulatory matters. The BCAJ has wide circulation across India & commands huge respect amongst the Chartered Accountants` community.
Learn MoreFor queries, collaborations, and insights to forge, Drop a line, share thoughts, inquiries galore, At BCAJ, your messages, we eagerly explore.
Learn More48
Declaration of Assets by SC Judges under RTI Act -Supreme Court should accept
verdict
The ruling by a three-member bench of the Delhi High Court is
truly historic. It upheld an earlier judgment of a single judge of the same
court, dismissing an appeal by the Supreme Court (SC) that the office of the
Chief Justice of India (CJI) comes within the ambit of the Right to Information
(RTI) Act. Doing so, the High Court has sent a clear message: No one is above
the law.
This is the most sacred principle in any democratic society
and it is heartening that the High Court sees no case as an exception. The prime
minister and the president are already covered by the RTI Act; so why not the
apex court judges? The ruling comes in a dispute over whether assets declared by
SC judges to the CJI should be disclosed under the RTI Act.
“The higher the judge is placed in the judicial hierarchy,
the greater the standard of accountability and the stricter the scrutiny of
accountability of such mechanism,” said the bench. We could not agree more.
(Source: The Economic Times, dated 14.01.2010)