Subscribe to the Bombay Chartered Accountant Journal Subscribe Now!

May 2010

Supreme Court — Special Leave Petition — Order passed by the High Court should be a speaking order — Matter remanded.

By Kishor Karia | Chartered Accountant
Atul Jasani | Advocate
Reading Time 1 mins

New Page 1

5 Supreme Court — Special Leave Petition — Order passed by
the High Court should be a speaking order — Matter remanded.


[Speed Lines P. Ltd. v. CIT, (2009) 316 ITR 102 (SC)]

The High Court had dismissed an appeal filed u/s. 260A of the
Act holding that no substantial question of law arose for its consideration. On
a special leave to the Supreme Court, the order of the High Court was set aside
by the Supreme Court since the order of the High Court was a non-speaking. The
matter was remitted to the High Court for fresh consideration on merits.

Download PDF

You May Also Like

Penalty — Concealment of income — Matter remanded to the High Court since it had relied upon its earlier decision which, though approved by the Supreme Court in some other matter, was later held to not lay down the correct law by Larger Bench of the Supre

Substantial question of law — Whether the assessee was entitled to deduction u/s.80-IA of the Act on the amount of entire eligible income without reducing the amount of export incentives from the same.