Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreBCAJ Brieficles are short-format, web-only articles on contemporary topics of professional importance that are open-for-all to read & share.
Explore BrieficlesExplore past issues of BCA Journal & indulge in a treasure trove of high-quality professional content across format of print, videos & learning events from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreMonthly mouth-piece of BCAS, the BCA Journal is a leading publication that has been in continuous circulation for more than 53 years. Over the years the BCAJ has become synonymous with high-quality & authentic content across fields of finance, accounting, tax & regulatory matters. The BCAJ has wide circulation across India & commands huge respect amongst the Chartered Accountants` community.
Learn MoreFor queries, collaborations, and insights to forge, Drop a line, share thoughts, inquiries galore, At BCAJ, your messages, we eagerly explore.
Learn More18 Condonation of delay of 4 years : Pendency of
representation filed before State Government against alleged order, sufficient
ground to condone delay : Constitution of India Article 226.
The petitioner had filed a writ petition before the High
Court against the decision of the State Government after 4 years from the date
of passing of such order. The High Court dismissed the petition on ground of
delay and laches.
The Supreme Court observed that the petitioner had filed a
representation/review of the decision of the State Government, and was expecting
that an order would be passed on the said representation. Therefore, the delay
in moving the writ petition was sufficiently explained by the petitioner and the
petition ought not to be dismissed on the ground of delay and laches. The High
Court was directed to decide the writ petition on merits in accordance with law.
[Ashok Kumar v. State of Bihar & Ors., AIR 2008
Supreme Court 2723]