Toggle navigation
Home
About
Introduction
Journal Policies
BCAS Website
Members
Enquiry
Feedback
Knowledge Resource
BCAS Events
BCAS Publications
SUBSCRIBE
BCAJ - Through Post
BCAJ - Through Courier
Gift a Subscription
Advertise With Us
Golden Content
Interviews
Articles
View and Counterview
BCA Journal
BCAJ PDF
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
Journals 2009
Journals 2008
Login
July 2020
Accountancy and Audit
From Published Accounts
FROM PUBLISHED ACCOUNTS
Article
LEARNINGS FOR AUDIT FIRMS IN THE ERA OF PCAOB AND NFRA
IND AS/IGAAP - Interpretation & Practical Application
ACCOUNTING RELIEF FOR RENT CONCESSIONS ON LEASES
Corporate and Other Laws
Allied Laws
ALLIED LAWS
Securities Laws
PROPOSAL FOR SOCIAL STOCK EXCHANGES BOLD, INNOVATIVE AND TIMELY
Laws And Business
CAN AGRICULTURAL LAND BE WILLED TO A NON-AGRICULTURIST?
Article
CURRENT THEMES IN CORPORATE RESTRUCTURINGS AND M&As
Corporate Law Corner
CORPORATE LAW CORNER
FEMA Focus
AMENDMENT IN FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT RULES
Direct Taxes
Controversies
DEDUCTIBILITY OF FOREIGN TAXES
In the High Courts: Part A - Reported Decisions
Appeal to Appellate Tribunal Duty of Tribunal to decide appeal on merits Rule 24 of ITAT Rules, 1963 Rectification of mistakes Section 254 of ITA, 1961 Order of Tribunal dismissing appeal ex parte for non-prosecution Rejection of application for recall on ground of limitation Not justified Assessee granted liberty to apply for recall of order; A.Y. 2006-07
Business expenditure Section 37 of ITA, 1961 General principles Donations made by company under corporate social responsibility Deductible u/s 37; A.Y. 2010-11
Business expenditure Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of ITA, 1961 Amounts not deductible Payments liable to deduction of tax at source Failure to deduct tax at source Law applicable Effect of amendment of section 40(a)(ia) with effect from 1st April, 2013 providing for cases where recipient has declared income in question and paid tax thereon Amendment retrospective Non-deduction of tax at source not causing loss to Revenue Disallowance not applicable; A.Y. 2005-06
Deduction u/s 80-IB(10) of ITA, 1961 Housing projects Scope of section 80-IB(10) Not necessary that developer should be owner of land Joint venture agreement showing assessee was developer Assessee entitled to special deduction u/s 80-IB(10); A.Y. 2010-11
Exemption u/s 10(17A) of ITA, 1961 Award for meritorious service in public interest Scope of section 10(17A) Approval of State Government or Central Government Formal approval not mandatory Approval may be implied; A.Y. 2010-11
Loss Set-off of Sections 72(2), 72A and 263 of ITA, 1961 and sections 18 and 32(2) of SICA, 1985 Amalgamation of companies Provision for carry forward by amalgamated company of accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation of amalgamating company Sick industrial company Sanction of scheme by Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction implies that requirements of section 72(2) satisfied; A.Y. 2004-05
Search and seizure Assessment u/s 153A of ITA, 1961 Scope of section 153A Assessee can raise new claims for deduction in return filed u/s 153A; A.Y. 2008-09
Glimpses Of Supreme Court Rulings
GLIMPSES OF SUPREME COURT RULINGS
Tribunal News : PART A - Reported Decision
Section 5 When an assessee had an obligation to perform something and the assessee had not performed those obligations, nor does he even seem to be in a position to perform those obligations, a partial payment for fulfilling those obligations cannot be treated as income in the hands of the assessee
Section 143(3), CBDT Instruction No. 5/2016 Assessment order passed upon conversion of case from limited scrutiny to complete scrutiny, in violation of CBDT Instruction No. 5/2016, is a nullity
Rule 34 of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Rules The period of 90 days prescribed in Rule 34(5) needs to be computed by excluding the period during which lockdown was in force
Tribunal News : PART B - Unreported Decisions
Section 153C Assessment u/s 153C which has been initiated without issuance of notice u/s 153C is bad in law
Notional interest on security deposit received from lessee is not taxable even during the period when the property was sold, but the deposit continued with the lessee as the lease agreement had lock-in clause Only the incomes which fall under the deemed provisions which have been explicitly mentioned in the Act can be brought to tax under the deeming provisions but not any other notional or hypothetical income not envisaged by the Act
Section 148 Assessment completed pursuant to a notice u/s 148 of the Act issued mechanically without application of mind is void and bad in law
Section 271(1)(c) Disallowance u/s 43B in respect of service tax, not debited to P&L, does not attract penalty u/s 271(1)(c)
In The High Courts: Part B -Unreported Decisions
[Appellate Tribunal in I.T.A. No. 5535/Mum/2014; Date of order: 11th January, 2017; A.Y.: 2003-04; Bench F Mum.] Appeal u/s 260A Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) The question relating to non-striking off of the inapplicable portion in the section 271(1)(c) show cause notice goes to the root of the lis and is a jurisdictional issue Issue can be raised first time before High Court Penalty cannot be imposed for alleged breach of one limb of section 271(1)(c) of the Act while proceedings are initiated for breach of the other limb of section 271(1)(c) Penalty deleted
Editorial
Editorial
Banking as a Service
From The President
From The President
FROM THE PRESIDENT
Indirect Taxes
Recent Decisions: Part A: Service Tax
Service Tax
Recent Decisions: Part B: VAT
VAT
Decoding GST
INTERLINKING BETWEEN GST AND CUSTOMS
Recent Decision Part C:
GOODS AND SERVICEs TAX (GST)
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN GST
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN GST
GST on Payments made to Directors - Some Clarity
GST ON PAYMENTS MADE TO DIRECTORS SOME CLARITY
International Taxation
Tribunal News : PART C -
Article 13 of India-Mauritius DTAA; section 245R of the Act As gain on sale of shares by a Mauritius company in a Singapore company which derived substantial value from assets in India was, prima facie, designed for avoidance of tax, applications were to be rejected under clause (iii) to proviso to section 245R(2) of the Act
Explanations 6 and 7 to section 9(1)(i) of the Act Indirect transfer tests of 50% threshold of substantial value (Explanation 6) and small shareholder (Explanation 7) are to be applied retrospectively
Namaskaar
Namaskaar
PRAYERS: OUR SEARCH ENGINE
News and Views
Society News
SOCIETY NEWS
Miscellanea
MISCELLANEA
Ethics and You
ETHICS AND U
Tech Mantra
USEFUL FEATURES OF WhatsApp
Letters to The Editor
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Regulatory Referencer
REGULATORY REFERENCER
Practice Management
Article
WORKING CAPITAL CHALLENGES FOR CA FIRMS IN COVID TIMES
Risk and Technology Challenges for Professionals
Article
OVERCOMING THE CHALLENGE OF RISK MANAGEMENT IN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THE RUN-UP TO AUDIT IN THE 2030s
TAX AND TECHNOLOGY: ARE TAX PROFESSIONALS AT RISK?
Keywords Search
Flip-Book Search
Select Month
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2020
2019
2018
2017
HTML View Search
Select Month
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
Current Issue